Legal Opinion

Witcher Construction Co. v. Estes II Ltd. Partnership

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1991No. C5-90-1369PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Renovation of the International Harvester Building in St. Paul was separated into two parts for contracting purposes. The first part was base building or shell renovation work and the second part was the improvement of tenant areas. The claims of respondent mechanics’ lienholders arise under the contract for tenant improvement work.

The predecessor of appellant MeraBank Federal Savings and Loan filed a mortgage lien against the project property. Appellant claims the mortgage was filed after the execution of the first contract and before work began under the second contract.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. M. E. Kraft Excavating & Grading Co. v. Barac Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Barrett v. HampeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. New Prague Lumber & Readi-Mix Co. v. BastyrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Delyea v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Kahle v. McClarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. Phenix Biocomposites, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION v. Andron Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Poured Concrete Foundations Inc. v. Andron, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ford Mall Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  5. Big Lake Lumber, Inc. v. Security Property Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API