Kahle v. McClary
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
In an action to foreclose a mechanics lien, defendant First Federal Savings and Loan Association appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The facts are as follows: Prior to August 9, 1955, defendants W. R. McClary and Esther McClary, his wife, (herein referred to as McClarys) decided to convert their one-family dwelling into a duplex. Plaintiff, a heating and plumbing contractor, entered into a verbal agreement with McClarys to make the necessary changes in the heating system. Payment was to be made on a quantum meruit basis. On August 9, 1955, the work began.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frankoviz v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- American Bridge Co. v. HonstainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Fitzpatrick v. ErnstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Paine & Nixon Co. v. DahlvickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Coughlan v. LonginiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Amtech Lighting Services Co. v. Payless Cashways (In Re Payless Cashways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Hayle Floor Covering, Inc. v. First Minnesota Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- New Prague Lumber & Readi-Mix Co. v. BastyrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Albert and Harlow Inc. v. Great Northern Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Rochester's Suburban Lumber Company v. SlocumbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.