Legal Opinion

POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION v. Andron Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 1995No. C8-94-1875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

529 N.W.2d 506 (1995)

POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff,

v.

ANDRON, INC., et al., Defendants,

Construction Mortgage Investors, Inc., Respondent,

Dura Supreme, Inc., et al., London Brick, Inc., Appellants.

No. C8-94-1875.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 11, 1995.

Review Denied May 31, 1995.

James A. Beitz, Hagerty, Johnson, Albrightson & Beitz, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Vincent J. Fahnlander, Curtis D. Smith, Moss & Barnett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellants Dura Supreme, Inc.

Reese Chezick, Hastings, for appellant London Brick, Inc.

Considered and decided by PARKER, P.J.,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. New Prague Lumber & Readi-Mix Co. v. BastyrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Enviro-Fab, Inc. v. Blandin Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Rochester's Suburban Lumber Company v. SlocumbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. R.B. Thompson, Jr. Lumber Co. v. Windsor Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amtech Lighting Services Co. v. Payless Cashways (In Re Payless Cashways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Big Lake Lumber, Inc. v. Security Property Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Big Lake Lumber, Inc. v. Security Property Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Marriage of Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API