Legal Opinion

Estancia Development Associates, L.L.C. v. City of Scottsdale

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 23, 1999No. 1 CA-TX 98-0006PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

¶ 1 We hold in this appeal that the Model Tax Code, adopted as part of the Scottsdale Revised Code, does not tax sales of real property that is unimproved at the time of its sale. Accordingly, we reverse summary judgment entered by the Tax Court against Estancia Development Associates, L.L.C. (“Estancia”) and for the City of Scottsdale on Estancia’s claim for a refund of speculative builder taxes and penalties. The appeal presents these issues:

1. Did the Tax Court err in sustaining the application of the City’s speculative builder tax to sales of unimproved real…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blake v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Long v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Rash v. Town of MammothCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Hornbeck v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API