Legal Opinion

Rash v. Town of Mammoth

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 13, 2013No. 2 CA-CV 2013-0062PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this appeal from a statutory special action, appellant Samuel Rash appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his claims challenging his termination from the Town of Mammoth police force. On appeal, he argues the court erred by finding the time limits of the Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure applicable to statutory special actions and in concluding that the doctrine of laches would otherwise bar his claims. Because we conclude the court erred in applying the procedural rules and the laches doctrine, we vacate and remand.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. MeienbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Swichtenberg v. BrimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Stant v. City of Maricopa Employee Merit BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. E.L. v. Hon CarmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  4. Fox v. Maricopa CoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API