Long v. Napolitano
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether legislation creating and implementing the Tourism and Sports Authority (“TSA”), Ariz.Rev. Stat. (“A.R.S.”) §§ 5-802 to -877 (Supp. 2001), is an unconstitutional special law favoring only Maricopa County. We must further determine whether the TSA funding mechanism violates the constitutional debt limitation. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the TSA legislation is not a prohibited special law and does not violate the debt limitation established by our constitution. However, we sever the language from A.R.S. § 5-866(1)…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- CLEAN v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Estate of McGill Ex Rel. McGill v. AlbrechtArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Steve Gallardo v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Town of Gilbert v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Grand Canyon Trust v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.