Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John Doe
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Judge.
We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent because appellants’ claims lie outside the scope of the summary nature of an eviction action. We also affirm the district court’s denial of an unconditional stay of the eviction because appellants do not contend that théy did not default on their mortgage or that they lack an alternative forum to litigate their other claims.
FACTS
In March 2002, appellants Gary and Leila Mitchell executed a mortgage of their home in favor of Signal Bank. Shortly afterward, Signal Bank assigned its interest to Wells Fargo…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dahlin v. KroeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Enright v. LehmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Dahlberg v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. StangeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Harbal v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Christopher R. Coker, (A15-1439, A15-1445), (A15-1606) v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, (A15-1439), (A15-1606), Hennepin County, (A15-1445).Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Doris A. Seward v. Taylor Florin-Clemants, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Eric Wong v. Chatterbox Pub Enterprises, Inc., Tyrone SharpeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Hegenes Properties, LLC v. Michelle Rodriguez, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
- Mike Malone v. Frances S. Bland, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.