SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether respondent Shamrock Development, Inc.’s attempted service of process by publication on appellant Randall Smith satisfied the requirements of Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.04(a) and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. The district court concluded that the service by publication was sufficient, and the court of appeals affirmed. We reverse and remand to the district court.
In April 1996 the Hennepin County District Court entered a civil judgment in favor of Farm Credit Leasing Services Corporation (Farm Credit)…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Dahlin v. KroeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Estate of Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
- Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.