Legal Opinion
Lamere v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 19, 2013No. A12-0609PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAUBER, Judge.
On appeal from summary judgment, appellant argues that the district court erred by concluding that appellant’s manufacturing-defect claim was preempted by the Medical Device Amendments (MDA) of 1976 to the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. By notice of related appeal, respondent argues that the district court erred by concluding that appellant’s claim is not time-barred under Minnesota’s wrongful-death statute of limitations. Because we conclude that a claim arises at the time the alleged wrong-doing occurred, we reverse the district court’s order and hold that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Bausch v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Hardieplank Fiber Cement Siding Litig.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Angeles v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Doe v. Anoka CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
- International Decision Systems, Inc. v. JDR Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.