Legal Opinion

C&C Constr., Inc. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility District

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 2004No. C040761PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*291Opinion

NICHOLSON, J.

Defendant Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) discriminates on the basis of race in some of its public contracting activities. This case presents the question of whether this discrimination is permissible under section 31 of article I of the California Constitution (hereafter section 31).

Plaintiff C&C Construction (C&C) moved for summary judgment on its complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief in which it alleged that SMUD’s affirmative action program, the 1998 Equal Business Opportunity Program, violates section 31, adopted by the voters on November 5,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Connerly v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Shaw v. People Ex Rel. ChiangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. CORAL CONST. INC. v. San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Connerly v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Baez v. CalPERSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API