Legal Opinion
Connerly v. Schwarzenegger
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 2007No. C050204PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
53 Cal.Rptr.3d 203 (2007)
146 Cal.App.4th 739
Ward CONNERLY, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, as Governor, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants.
No. C050204.
Court of Appeal of California, Third District.
January 10, 2007.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Louis R. Mauro, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Catherine Van Aken and Michelle Mitchell Lopez, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Appellants.
Pacific Legal Foundation, John H. Findley and Paul J. Beard II for Plaintiff and Respondent.
BUTZ, J.
With the passage of Proposition 209 in 1996, California voters added…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- (PS) Harrell v. Elizabeth E. Ferguson Revocable Living TrustDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019