Inyo Marble Co. v. Loundagin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Appellant Inyo Marble Company, is a California corporation and the patentee of three placer mines containing about 480 acres within their exterior boundaries, to which they received a patent from the United States on August 26, 1921. The claims were first located in January, 1915, and the application for the patent was made on December 6, 1919. The patent contained the following provision: “That should any vein or lode of quartz or other rock in place bearing gold, silver, cinnabar, lead, tin, copper, or other valuable deposits, be claimed or known to exist within the above-described premises…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Eureka Consol. Min. Co. v. Richmond Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1877
- Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining & Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Reynolds v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Mike & Starr Gold & Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Titanium Actynite Industries v. McLennanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- TITANIUM ACTYNITE INDUSTRIES v. McLENNANCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Stanton v. WEBEROregon Supreme Court · 1959