Legal Opinion
Titanium Actynite Industries v. McLennan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1959No. 5989PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
In 1936 and 1938 defendant and his predecessors in interest located three placer claims1 in the White Earth Mining District, Gunnison County, Colorado. Shortly thereafter the plaintiffs located 34 lode mining claims covering approximately the same surface area included within the placer claims. In 1952 defendant applied for a patent to his claims and plaintiffs filed an adverse claim and brought this action as required by 30 U.S.C.A. § 30, to determine the right of possession. Although the adverse suit raised several issues, the parties agreed to a trial on the “sole…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Northern Pacific Railway Company v. SoderbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Beals v. ConeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Iron Silver Mining Co. v. CheesmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining & Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Veale v. PiercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Pepperdine v. KeysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- John Paul Jones and Ruth J. Rubel Jones v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Ranchers Exploration and Development Co. v. Anaconda Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1965
- Bowen v. Chemi-Cote Perlite CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.