Legal Opinion
Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. Balderston
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1938No. Nos. 6470 and 6471PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
In action No. 6470, appellants, as placer miners for themselves, and as representatives of the class to which they belong; and in action No. 6471, appellants as lode miners for themselves, and as representatives of the class to which they belong, respectively sued in the district court to require John L. Balderston, Commissioner of Law Enforcement of the State of Idaho, and J. W. Taylor, Attorney General of the State of Idaho, respondents, to show cause why they should not be enjoined and restrained from enforcing . chapter 65, Sess. Laws, 1935, 1st Extra Sess., p. 182 1 .
General demurrers…
2Cases cited150 opinions
- UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- United States v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- State v. PetersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Idaho Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. RobisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. O'BRYANIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Caesar v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Abney v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.