Legal Opinion

Stanton v. WEBER

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, c. j.

This suit in equity was commenced by the plaintiff, Roy C. Stanton, to impress a trust in his favor' upon certain lode mining claims, legal title to which was held by the defendant, Fred E. Weber. The intervenors, Albert E. Fray and Leland F. Fray, claim superior title through the alleged prior filing of certain placer mining claims on the same property. The defendant Mary LaBertew claims some interest in the property as an assignee of the Frays. From a decree in favor of plaintiff, the defendants and intervenors appeal.

The mining property involved in this ease is situated in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lockhart v. LeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Stewart v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hughes v. HelzerOregon Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coast Timber, Inc. v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API