Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appe.al by defendant from a judgment of tbe district court for Hennepin county, Elliott, J.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an appeal from a default judgment. The assignments of error raise two general questions for our consideration: Does the complaint allege facts constituting a cause of action? Was the plaintiff entitled to an absolute money judgment?
The complaint alleges, in effect, that the parties hereto entered into a contract whereby the plaintiff was to work for the defendant, and it was to pay him therefor $150 per month for every month he should work for it, to be paid $50 in cash, and $100 in *471the defendant’s capital stock, at the market value thereof, which was to be at the rate of ten cents on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People's Ice Co. v. SchlenkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Kingsley v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Truesdale v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Northern Trust Co. v. Albert Lea CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Solomon v. VinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Halloran v. BLUE AND WHITE LIBERTY CAB CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Rogers v. McCord-collins Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Muellenberg v. JoblinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.