Legal Opinion
Muellenberg v. Joblinski
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 10, 1933No. 29,144PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Chief Justice.
The appeal is from a judgment.
Plaintiff prosecuted the action to recover $1,516.65 alleged to be due in part on an account and in part on a promissory note. Defendant denied the indebtedness. Issue was joined, and the case was noticed for trial. The parties then made a settlement and executed a stipulation on October 7, 1931, agreeing that the action “be and the same is, hereby dismissed, without costs to either party, and with prejudice.” The parties executed the stipulation in.the presence of two witnesses and acknowledged the same before a notary. The title of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- McKinnon v. Red River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Murray v. City of PocatelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Robertson v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Joel Charchenko v. City of StillwaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Bulau v. BulauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Storey v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Dead Lake Ass'n, Inc. v. Otter Tail CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.