Legal Opinion
Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 16, 1966No. 39918 and 39969PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
The corporate defendants, Calder Manufacturing Company, a corporation, Calder Door Sales Company, a corporation, and Lancaster Wood Products Company, a corporation, stand in the same posture as far as this appeal is concerned and will hereinafter be referred to as Calder.
The defendant Samuel Saure is the owner and operator of an independent lumberyard in Fergus Falls. This case arises out of a sale by Saure to plaintiff, Robert Dieseth, in 1955 of an overhead garage door. The door was installed on Dieseth’s premises by one Roland H. Johnson, a Fergus Falls carpenter,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. KaufertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Bulau v. BulauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Janssen v. Best & Flanagan, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Pope County Board of Commissioners v. PryzmusCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.