Solomon v. Vinson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the district court for Olmsted county.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Appeal from a judgment entered upon defendants’ default. The objection is here interposed for the first time that the complaint does not state facts constituting a cause of action. The allegations of the complaint are “that on the 1st day of March, 1883, the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff on an account then past due, for goods sold and delivered to the defendants, (at a time and place specified,) in the sum of $241.13, and that the same is now due and owing plaintiff, and no part thereof has been paid.” The objections to this complaint are that it does not allege that the goods…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allen v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Hathaway v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Abadie v. CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Camp v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
- Kingsley v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McElrath v. McElrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Peach v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Trebby v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Yee Chin v. AtoyHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.