Legal Opinion

Moor v. Moor

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 7, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of El Paso. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Goggin.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

The present case is the offspring of a previous litigation between the same parties, which was finally determined, as will appear from appeals in Moor v. Moor, reported in 24 Texas Civ. App., 150, 63 S. W. Rep., 347.

The plaintiff, Fitzgerald Moor, has brought this suit in reference to items of charge in his favor against the former community estate of himself and defendant, which items he alleges accrued after February 16, 1900, the date of the decree of partition, and" before the final decree. It appears he endeavored to have such items allowed or credited in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. DibrellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Jordan v. . Van EppsNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Elwood v. BeymerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Caperton v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Wilson v. SangerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shook v. ShookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Deaton v. Southern Irr. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Dailey v. DaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Shook v. ShookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API