Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Sanger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

• Appeal by the defendant, William T. Sanger, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Franklin on the 8th day of March, 1900, upon the decision of the court rendered after "a trial at chambers in St. Lawrence, county, pursuant to an adjournment by stipulation from the Franklin Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Kellogg, J.:

For some years prior to November 20, 1896, the defendant and plaintiff’s assignor each owned an undivided interest in certain wild or non-resident lands, being township 23 and the triangle in the Adirondacks, the entire tract so owned being about 36,000 acres. The interest of plaintiff’s assignor, Elizabeth Copeland, was an undivided nine one-hundred-and-twenty-eighth part of each lot embraced in said tract. The entire tract was subdivided into lots and numbered from 2 to 226, both inclusive. Each lot was separately assessed, and upon each lot a separate tax .was levied in each…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lohr's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Moor v. MoorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Campo v. IsaacsonNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Olson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API