Legal Opinion

Deaton v. Southern Irr. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Wharton County; Wells Thompson, Judge. Action by the Southern Irrigation Company against G. W. Deaton and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant named appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

By deed, dated Hay 5, 1903, the Bay Prairie Irrigation Company conveyed to E. W. Turner lots 11 and 12, block 68, in the town of Lane City, Tex., expressly retaining in said deed the vendor’s lien on such premises to secure the payment of two promissory notes, of even date with said deed, for $1,144.89 each, executed by E. W. Turner, payable to the order of Bay Prairie Irrigation Company, bearing 8 per cent, interest per annum, and providing for 10 per cent, attorney’s fee, if collected by suit. One of said notes became due November 1, 1903, and the other November 1, 1904. On November 1,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Texas Land & Loan Co. v. BlalockTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Freeman v. McAninchTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Moore v. SnowballTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Nichols v. DibrellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Werlein v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kerens National Bank v. StocktonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API