Legal Opinion

Elwood v. Beymer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1885No. 11,536PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

The appellees, Catharine and Sealy Beymer, commenced this suit against the appellant, Vashti Elwood, and Jane and John Boxell, and one Trelawney Camblin, who is named as one of the appellees in this court, to obtain the partition of certain real estate, particularly described, in Grant county. In her complaint the appellee Catharine Beymer alleged that she and the defendants to her suit were the owners of such real estate, as the widow and heirs at law of one Thomas G. Elwood, deceased, who died in or about the year 1861, seized in fee of the real estate in controversy herein, and, also, of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Green v. GlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Ulrich v. DrischellIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Richardson v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Farrar v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Maynard v. WaidlichIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Horn v. Indianapolis National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Craighead v. DaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Wilson v. BuellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. KoonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API