Legal Opinion

Bursey v. Clement

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 31, 1978No. 7941PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This is a bill in equity to set aside the conveyance of real estate and rescind the underlying purchase and sale agreement. Trial before a Master (Mayland H. Morse, Jr., Esquire) resulted in a decree for the defendants. Flynn, J., transferred the plaintiff’s exception. We hold that under the facts before us, the defendants owed a duty to the plaintiff to inform him of the altered circumstances surrounding the transaction. Defendants’ failure to perform that duty justifies rescission; consequently we reverse.

The plaintiff is a real estate developer. In October 1976, he was searching for a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griswold v. Heat CorporationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  2. Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Maxwell Ice Co. v. Brackett, Shaw & Lunt Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
  4. Seaward Construction Co. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Bergeron v. DupontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cloutier v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Centronics Corp. v. Genicom Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  3. Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Layman v. BinnsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Barrows v. BolesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API