Maxwell Ice Co. v. Brackett, Shaw & Lunt Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.
The plaintiff was engaged in sawing oak and pine timber at Amoskeag with a portable sawmill propelled by a 35 horse-power (so-called) electric motor. He was under contract to saw pine timber upon a lot at Goffstown where electric power was not available. He therefore entered into negotiations with the defendant for the purchase of a kerosene engine to supply power in the place of his electric motor. The evidence tended to prove that he explained to the defendant’s agent “thoroughly” and “fully” the uses for which he wanted the engine; that he stated to the agent that he thought he ought to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Grube v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. ScholfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Strong v. . StrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Au v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Peters v. Murphy-KnightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Patch v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Lefebvre Intergraphics, Inc. v. Sanden MacHine Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.