Cloutier v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
In this appeal we essentially are asked to decide whether the plaintiff sufficiently established a public policy to satisfy the test for the wrongful discharge of an employee set forth in Howard v. Dorr Woolen Co., 120 N.H. 295, 414 A.2d 1273 (1980). Our review of the record reveals that there was a sufficient nexus between the public policy asserted by the plaintiff and the reasons for his discharge. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court.
From 1939 until his termination on January 13, 1977, with the exception of three years out for military service, David Cloutier, the plaintiff, was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Smith v. F.W. Morse Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.