Legal Opinion
Centronics Corp. v. Genicom Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 16, 1989No. 88-160PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
A contract between the buyer and seller of business assets provided for arbitration of any dispute about the value of the property transferred, to which the purchase price was pegged, and required an escrow deposit of a portion of the price claimed by the seller pending final valuation. The seller has charged the buyer with breach of an implied covenant of good faith in refusing, during arbitration, to release a portion of the escrow fund claimed to be free from “dispute.” The Superior Court {Hollman, J.) granted summary judgment to the buyer, which we affirm.
The agreement between the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Cloutier v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Wilfred J. Wakefield v. Northern Telecom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Dcpb, Inc. v. City of Lebanon, Dcpb, Inc. v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Diversified Foods, Inc. v. First National Bank of BostonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Godfrey v. Perkin-Elmer Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.