Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Carpenter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1948PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

This is an action in assumpsit for work, labor and materials. The plaintiffs are copartners. They allege in their complaint that, at the request of defendant, they painted and performed other labor upon certain buildings on defendant’s ranch, and furnished materials in connection with the work; that “a fair and reasonable charge for said labor and materials” was $2,088.56, of which the defendant has paid $1,293, leaving a balance of $795.56 due and owing. The defendant admitted that he requested plaintiffs to paint said buildings and that he has paid them the sum of $1,293, but denied all…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spain v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State Ex Rel. Bassett v. BassettOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Benson v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Cooper v. Hillsboro Garden TractsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Radtke v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. ReyesOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Thomas v. DAD'S ROOT BEER, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hancock v. CrouchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Kelly v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Lenslite Co. v. ZocherArizona Supreme Court · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API