Legal Opinion

In the Matter of McGoldrick v. . Traphagen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1882PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made January 28, 1881, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon an order confirming the report of a referee. This was a reference under the statute of a disputed claim against an estate. The claim was an account for work, etc., in shoeing horses for defendant’s testator.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made January 28, 1881, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon an order confirming the report of a referee. This was a reference under the statute of a disputed claim against an estate. The claim was an account for work, etc., in shoeing horses for defendant’s testator. To prove the account the claimant offered Ms ledger in evidence, wMch was received under objection and exception. The evidence in relation thereto is substantially stated in the opinion.…

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

We think that there was no error committed by the admission of the ledger of the respondent as evidence. It was proved upon the trial that the work done by the respondent for the testator was first entered at the time upon a slate, generally by the respondent. The entries were then transferred by the book-keeper to a day-book about every day, and then to the ledger from the day-book. Ho prices for the work were entered until the charges were carried out into the ledger and then the respondent fixed the prices and they were entered accordingly. The respondent testified that he directed the men…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Ithaca & Owego Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Vosburgh v. ThayerNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  3. Faxon v. HollisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  4. Sickles v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Radtke v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Radcliffe v. ChavesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State Bank of Pike v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Smith v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. In re Extradition of TullyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API