Legal Opinion

Becker v. Steele

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Norton District Court. Replevin by Steele & Walker against Beaker, constable. Judgment for plaintiffs, at the September term, 1887. The defendant brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

The facts in this case are substantially as follows: The Exchange Bank of Lenora commenced an action against A. C. Lappin before a justice of the peace, and obtained an order of attachment, which was levied upon the property in controversy by the constable, John Becker; before the trial a motion was filed by the defendant to discharge the attachment, upon the ground that the facts alleged in the affidavit for the attachment were untrue; upon the hearing of the motion it was overruled, the justice deciding that the attachment was valid.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butcher v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Gates v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. N. B. Brown & Co. v. TuppenySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Roll v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  5. St. Joseph & D. C. Rld. v. CaseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Green v. HooperNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Miller v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
  3. Nichols v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Thompson v. GroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Casner v. StreitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API