Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Grove

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1919No. 8786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Payne County; James B. Gullison, Judge. Action by H. E. Grove against Ray Thompson and others. Verdict and.judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action to recover the possession of specific personal property, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below.

Hereafter, for convenience the parties will be designated “plaintiff” and “defendants,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

The errors relied upon for reversal may be summarized as follows:(1) The petition of said plaintiff shows upon its face that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. CobbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Broyles Et Ux. v. McInteerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Hagan v. Deuell & VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1866
  4. Becker v. SteeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Ranft v. YoungNevada Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Shaide v. BrynjelfsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Winter v. HarvellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Mutual Refining Co. v. Union Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API