N. B. Brown & Co. v. Tuppeny
Supreme Court of Kansas
Mror from Cloud District Court. At the October Term, 1879, of the district court, iu the case of Tuppeny against Hill, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff and against the defendant, and an order was entered requiring Brown & Co. as garnishees to pay into court $90 for the use of Tuppeny. Brown & Co. bring the case here. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On the 21st day of December, 1878, plaintiffs in error were summoned as garnishees in an action then pending before J. M. Hagaman,-a justice of the peace of *30Cloud county, wherein Walter G. Tuppeny was plaintiff and James Hill was defendant. On the 30th day of December, 1878, N. B. Brown, one of the plaintiffs in error, appeared before the justice and answered as garnishee as follows: “James Hill, defendant, deposited with us a draft for collection of $126.18, upon which we paid Mr. Hill $26.18. This draft was deposited before the service…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kœhler v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
- Dexter v. CochranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Gates v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
3Cited by6 opinions
- Becker v. SteeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Roll v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Thompson v. GroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Erickson v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Columbia Land & Cattle Co v. DalySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.