Roll v. Murray
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Jefferson District Court. . At the February Term, 1885, of the district court, the defendant Murray moved to dismiss that part of the plaintiff’s appeal which had for its object the review of the order of the justice pf the peace dissolving the attachment, which motion the court sustained. This ruling the plaintiffs bring here for review.
1Opinion of the Court
*172The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by Henry E. Roll, Norton Thayer, Thomas R. Williams and J. B. Welsh, partners as Roll, Thayer, Williams & Co., before a justice of the peace of Jefferson county, to recover $265.89 from J. H. Murray. At the time of the commencement of the action, an order of attachment was obtained, which was afterward levied upon certain property of the defendant. Afterward, and upon the motion of the defendant, the attachment was dissolved. The case then came on for hearing upon its merits, and judgment was rendered in favor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Butcher v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Gates v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- N. B. Brown & Co. v. TuppenySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- St. Joseph & D. C. Rld. v. CaseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
3Cited by6 opinions
- Maggert v. KeeleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Becker v. SteeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Nation v. SavelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. WitterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Indiahoma Refining Co. v. KunklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.