Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Joseph v. Mannix

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1930PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In Banc. Mr. Thomas Mannix, a duly licensed member of the bar of this state was tried by three circuit court judges, whom this court had previously appointed as referees, on a rule to show cause why he should not be removed from the roll of attorneys; the order was granted upon the petition of Mr. George W. Joseph. The charges against the defendant are extensive and we shall mention only those upon which the referees made findings. These are (1) that the defendant between the dates of June 28, 1921, and August 27, 1924, obtained money under false pretenses through the instrumentality of eight…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wemme v. First Church of ChristOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People ex rel. Johnson v. GeorgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of ComynsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State ex rel. McCormick v. WintonOregon Supreme Court · 1884
  5. People ex rel. Cutler v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Warkentin v. KleinwachterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Williford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Maggart v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API