Legal Opinion
Warkentin v. Kleinwachter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 21, 1933No. 23388PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The State Bar of Oklahoma has recommended to this court that the respondent herein be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. The question presented for determination by this court is whether or not that recommendation be approved by this court and an order made in conformity therewith.
A statement of the ease is included in the brief of the respondent, as follows:
“On March 1, 1930, the respondent, W. L. Kleinwachter, and his wife were in Oklahoma City, Okla., transacting business and shopping, and about 7 p. not., Earl Evans, a nephew of Mrs. Kleinwachter, phoned from…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Moore v. StricklingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- State Bar Commission Ex Rel. Williams v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- In Re HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Joseph v. MannixOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re MosherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. SallingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Boone v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- People v. Hotchkiss, New York County Courts1969
- State v. MoormanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.