Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McCormick v. Winton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Lord, J.:

This is an information on the relation of Hugh McCormick, filed in this court, against F. D. Winton, asking for an order to show cause why he should not be removed from his office as an attorney of this state. The facts alleged are in substance of this character: In the year 1883, at a regular term of the circuit court for Clatsop county, the complainant, James Franklin, Win. Bannister, James McCarty, Jas. Driscoll and Wm. Loyd were indicted by the grand jury of said county for the crime of kidnapping. As their attorney, the defendants so indicted employed the said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Ex parte SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Evans v. Missouri, Iowa & Nebraska Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Fletcher v. DaingerfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In re the Disbarment of SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. In re OWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Ricker's PetitionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890
  5. Ex parte TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API