People ex rel. Cutler v. Ford
Illinois Supreme Court
Rule on an attorney at law, to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll. The opinion of the court states, substantially, the facts on which the rule was entered.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton
This was a rule against George E. Ford, an attorney of the supreme court, to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of attorneys.
The rule was based upon an affidavit, in the nature of an information, filed in this court by George H. Cutler, the relator, and, though duly served on the defendant, he has made no answer.
The facts, as stated in the affidavit are, that one Sarah Jones, in the spring of 1870, applied to Cutler and Hinds, attorneys at law in Erie county, Pennsylvania, in reference to her interest in certain lands in Pike county, Illinois, and they commenced a…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Sanborn v. KimballSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1875
- In re SimpsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- People ex rel. Shufeldt v. BarkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Moutray v. People ex rel. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- State Ex Rel. Joseph v. MannixOregon Supreme Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.