Legal Opinion

In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of Comyns

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1925No. C.D. 501. En BancPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

The state board of bar examiners recommend the disbarment of respondent under the following provision of the law:

“An attorney or counselor may be disbarred or suspended for any of the following causes arising after his admission to practice: 1. His conviction of a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, in which case the record of conviction shall be conclusive evidence . . .” Rem. Comp. Stat., §139-14 [P. C. §166],

The sole ground relied upon for the disbarment is a certified transcript of the record in the district court of the United States for the western district of Washington…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of EbbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. In re the Disbarment of HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ex parte BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Byron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Olson v. LangerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  3. In Re NeedhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Neibling v. TerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReamerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API