Legal Opinion
Union Ink Co., Inc. v. AT&T CORP.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 28, 2002PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
801 A.2d 361 (2002)
352 N.J. Super. 617
UNION INK CO., INC., and Marci Bloom, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AT&T CORP., and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 5, 2001.
Decided June 28, 2002.
William J. Pinilis, Newark, argued the cause for appellants (Kaplan, Kilsheimer & Fox, attorneys; Mr. Pinilis, with Laurence D. King of the California bar, on the brief).
Douglas S. Eakeley, Roseland, argued the cause for respondents (Lowenstein Sandler, attorneys; Mr. Eakeley, with Howard Spierer, of counsel; Mr. Eakeley and Michael…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Snyder v. FARNAM COMPANIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Arcand v. Brother International Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Hoffman v. Asseenontv. Com, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.