Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Asseenontv. Com, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 5, 2009No. A-1840-07T1PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
962 A.2d 532 (2009)
404 N.J. Super. 415
Harold M. HOFFMAN, individually and in behalf of the class of purchasers of product marketed on the websites Asseenontv.com and Seenontv.com, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent,
v.
ASSEENONTV.COM, INC., Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
No. A-1840-07T1
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 17, 2008.
Decided January 5, 2009.
Harold M. Hoffman, Roseland, appellant/cross-respondent, argued the cause pro se.
Erika N.D. Stanat (Harter Secrest & Emery) of the New York Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Earl v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Discover Bank v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Eduardo Cortez v. Joseph G. Gindhart, Esquire D/B/A Joseph G. Gindhart & Associates and Joseph G. Gindhart & AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- Hoffman v. SUPPLEMENTS TOGO MGT.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Bove v. Akpharma Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- Lisa R. Worthy v. Kennedy Health SystemNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.