Legal Opinion
Raymond v. Bartlett
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1946No. Civ. 15632PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The plaintiff, as a taxpayer of Torrance, sued to enjoin respondent Leech, city treasurer, from paying respondent Bartlett, city clerk, and Bartlett from accepting a monthly salary of $50 for his services as purchasing agent of the city. From an adverse judgment plaintiff appeals.
For 24 years Bartlett has been the duly elected, qualified and acting city clerk of Torrance and now receives a regular monthly salary of $250 as such clerk. After acting six years as purchasing agent he was by the city council reemployed to fill that position in July, 1944, on a part-time basis and has received…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Miller v. City of MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- County of Shasta v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Finnegan v. SchraderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- City of Coral Gables v. WekslerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Cal. Taxpayers Action Network v. Taber Constr., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.