Legal Opinion

Finnegan v. Schrader

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 2001No. A088188, A089476PublishedCited by 24 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.—

Introduction

These consolidated appeals arise from a taxpayer’s suit challenging the appointment of defendant Carl F. Schrader as district manager of the West Bay Sanitary District (WBSD or District). The suit alleged that Schrader’s appointment violated state conflict of interest law because Schrader was a member of the District’s Board of Directors at the time of his appointment. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment declaring Schrader’s employment contract void and compelling Schrader to restore all compensation he had received under it. By posttrial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kerr's Catering Service v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Eldridge v. Sierra View Local Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. County of Shasta v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Koehl v. Verio, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. HUB CITY SOLID WASTE SERVICES, INC. v. City of ComptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. San Bernardino County v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API