Legal Opinion

Miller v. City of Martinez

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 1, 1938No. Civ. 10596PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

By this action plaintiff as a taxpayer and resident of the City of Martinez seeks to recover the sum of $4,639.89, under the provisions of a statute which forbids a public officer from being interested in contracts made by a governing body of which he is a member. The trial court sustained demurrers to the third amended complaint in this action, and upon a failure to amend, judgment was entered for defendants.

The following facts appear in the complaint: Plaintiff is a citizen, resident and a taxpayer of the City of Martinez. Martinez is a municipal corporation of the sixth…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. County of Shasta v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. County of Sacramento v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hobbs, Wall & Co. v. MoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API