Miller v. City of Martinez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, J., pro tem.
By this action plaintiff as a taxpayer and resident of the City of Martinez seeks to recover the sum of $4,639.89, under the provisions of a statute which forbids a public officer from being interested in contracts made by a governing body of which he is a member. The trial court sustained demurrers to the third amended complaint in this action, and upon a failure to amend, judgment was entered for defendants.
The following facts appear in the complaint: Plaintiff is a citizen, resident and a taxpayer of the City of Martinez. Martinez is a municipal corporation of the sixth…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- County of Shasta v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- County of Sacramento v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Hobbs, Wall & Co. v. MoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.