Legal Opinion

Bradbury v. Goodwin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1886No. 12,711PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Wayne Circuit Court,

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The following are the material facts as they appear in the complaint in this case : On the 23d day of July, 1884, William H. and Wilbern K. Bradbury were engaged in the real estate and insurance business, under the firm name of Wm.H. Bradbury & Son. They occupied an office in the second story of a building adjoining the Second National Bank building, situate on Main street, in the city of Richmond.

Being, about to change their business location, they employed the plaintiff, George W. Goodwin, to assist in removing their heavy iron safe from the room theretofore occupied to another, into which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Arkerson v. DennisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Peschel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Umback v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Behm v. ArmourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Jenney Electric Light & Power Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API