Umback v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Laporte Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The first paragraph of the appellant’s complaint charges that Umback was a servant of the appellee, ■engaged in performing duties as a switchman; that his employment imposed upon him the duty of coupling and uncoupling cars; that the appellee wrongfully and negligently used unsafe and dangerous cars, known as the Empire cars, .and that by reason thereof he was injured. The second paragraph contains the same statements as to the employment and duties of Umback, and alleges that the appellee, with knowledge of the unfitness and incapacity of a superior agent, retained him in its service, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gibson v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Fuller v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern R. W. Co. v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Devitt v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Pennsylvania Co. v. LynchIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Atlas Engine Works v. RandallIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.