Legal Opinion

Exxon Corp. v. Miesch

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided November 29, 2005No. 13-00-104-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice VALDEZ.

This appeal follows a jury trial in an oil and gas case. Emerald Oil & Gas, L.C. (“Emerald”), a subsequent lessee, and intervening royalty interest owners 1 brought suit against Exxon Corp. and Exxon Texas, Inc., as successor in interest to Humble Oil & Refining Co. (“Exxon”), for wrongful conduct in the development and abandonment of oil and gas wells in the Mary Ellen O’Connor Field, near Refugio, Texas. The trial court granted Exxon’s motion for directed verdict and en tered a take-nothing judgment against Emerald. 2 The jury found in favor of the…

2Cases cited121 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re Discovery Operating, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
  3. USA Truck, Inc. v. West, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  4. Double Diamond, Inc. v. Saturn, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  5. Dexter v. BrakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API