Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LC
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wainwright
After issuing our opinion, we granted respondent’s motion for rehearing on November 20, 2009 and obtained further briefing from the parties. Without further oral argument, we withdraw our opinion of March 27, 2009 and substitute the following opinion. Our judgment remains unchanged. 1
In this oil and gas dispute, we determine whether section 85.321 of the Texas Natural Resources Code allows a subsequent mineral lessee to maintain a cause of action against a prior lessee for damages to the mineral interest that occurred prior to the time the subsequent lessee obtained its interest. We hold that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Alex Sheshunoff Management Services, L.P. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Justin Curtis Nall, Robert W. Nall, and Olga L. Nall v. John B. PlunkettTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Ninety Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars & No Cents in United States Currency ($90,235)Texas Supreme Court · 2013
- City of Lorena, Texas v. Bmtp Holdings, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
- Elness Swenson Graham Architects, Inc. v. RLJ II-C Austin Air, LPCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.