Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Lovell

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1927No. 7592PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

This is a peculiar ease. Appellant, Marshall, seeks to recover certain property, or its value, which he delivered to appellee in performance of a contract conceded by him to be illegal, and so found by the trial court. Briefly the circumstances are these:

Appellee was heavily interested as a bondholder in the Wenatchee Talley Gas & Electric Company, a corporation of the state of Washington (hereinafter designated as the-Wenatchee Company). The affairs of that company becoming critical, a bondholders’ committee was formed, consisting of ap-pellee, Lovell, one John B.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. BucknerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Sedco International, S. A. v. CoryDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1981
  3. Tampa Electric Company v. Nashville Coal Company, Nashville Coal, Inc., and West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  4. John Arthur Wager v. Maynard J. ProCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. Magidson v. Duggan (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API