Marshall v. Lovell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENYON, Circuit Judge.
This is a peculiar ease. Appellant, Marshall, seeks to recover certain property, or its value, which he delivered to appellee in performance of a contract conceded by him to be illegal, and so found by the trial court. Briefly the circumstances are these:
Appellee was heavily interested as a bondholder in the Wenatchee Talley Gas & Electric Company, a corporation of the state of Washington (hereinafter designated as the-Wenatchee Company). The affairs of that company becoming critical, a bondholders’ committee was formed, consisting of ap-pellee, Lovell, one John B.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. BucknerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Sedco International, S. A. v. CoryDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1981
- Tampa Electric Company v. Nashville Coal Company, Nashville Coal, Inc., and West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- John Arthur Wager v. Maynard J. ProCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Magidson v. Duggan (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.