Legal Opinion
Sun Oil Company v. Martin
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 11, 1963No. Civ. A. 1515PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARZA, District Judge.
On September 29, 1958, the Railroad Commission of Texas granted to Defendant Harry L. Martin permission to triply complete the McKinsey, et ah, Well No. 1 in the Shepherd Field, Hidalgo County, Texas. As completed, the lower tubing of this well was to produce oil and gas from the McKinsey Sand reservoir, the upper tubing was to produce gas from the Mellinger Sand reservoir, and the casing was to produce gas from the Martin Sand reservoir.
A packer setting affidavit and results of a packer leakage test were furnished the Railroad Commission to show compliance with its…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gregg v. Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1961
- Elliff v. Texon Drilling. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Laurest J. Trahan, Cross-Appellees v. Superior Oil Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Arkla Exploration Co. v. Haywood, Rice & William Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1993
- Sun Oil Company v. Harry L. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Mound Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.