Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Pace Suburban Bus Service

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 23, 1996No. 96 C 25PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff sues his alleged former employers for overtime wages. Defendant Pace Suburban Bus Service (Pace) moves for summary judgment, contending that it was not plaintiff’s employer. Defendant Car Enterprises, Ltd. (Car) also moves for summary judgment. It concedes that it employed plaintiff but contends that plaintiff is not covered by the overtime compensation provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act because he is subject to the Motor Carrier exemption. Both motions are granted and judgment is entered for defendants.

The undisputed facts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Schwerman Trucking Company of Virginia, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  3. Dole v. SimpsonDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991
  4. Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor U.S. Department of Labor v. American Driver Service, Inc., a Corporation James I. Roberts, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Dole v. Circle "A" Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Savings First Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  2. Rossi v. Associated Limousine Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
  3. Cerutti v. FRITO LAY, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Bell v. H.F. Cox, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Godlewska v. HDADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API